|
Post by bulldog on Aug 2, 2019 17:52:02 GMT 1
I know a photo of this development has been put on somewhere, so please move if thread already exists. Drove past yesterday and this is structure so far. Should just a about fit a VC10 I think!! IMG_6224 by Clive Harden, on Flickr
|
|
|
Post by viscount on Aug 2, 2019 18:21:09 GMT 1
Don't know what the size requirement the hangar was built around, or indeed what the internal space dimensions are. A VC-10 is a big aircraft, but another British favourite airliner of the same period, the BAC.111-200 is indeed not that much larger than a Legacy 500, and a Falcon 7X remarkably similar! Plus the hangar needs to accommodate a Bell 429 helicopter with an 11m rotor diameter. | BAC.111-200 | EMB Legacy 500 | Falcon 7X | V.1101 VC-10 | Length | 28.5m | 20.0m | 23.5m | 48.5m | Wing Span | 27.0m | 19.5m | 26.0m | 44.6m | Height | 7.5m | 6.5m | 7.8m | 12.0m |
Source: Wikipedia. Some slight rounding up of a couple of the measurements.
|
|
|
Post by northbynorthwest on Aug 8, 2019 17:36:33 GMT 1
That is an impressive hangar. It looks like offices to the left side - larger than I would have imagined for the operation of a corporate jet and couple of helicopters. Looking t the Merseyflight webcam right now, I can see a large digger which is obviously preparing the taxiway to the hangar. I can also see something the the right of the digger that I cannot quite make out. It has a sheen to it, and the only thing I can think of would be chain link fencing with the sun behind it - would that be correct? I presume that, when the construction starts on the junction between the parallel taxiway and the taxiway to the hangar, that part of the parallel taxiway may be closed for periods of time, leading to aircraft having to taxi along the runway. That could be interesting.
|
|
|
Post by Beemer on Aug 9, 2019 6:54:04 GMT 1
The new hangar as seen yesterday from the GA road. The cream coloured panels appear to be exterior plywood. New hangar by Beemer328i, on Flickr
|
|
|
Post by dalten1 on Aug 14, 2019 10:46:58 GMT 1
That is an impressive hangar. It looks like offices to the left side - larger than I would have imagined for the operation of a corporate jet and couple of helicopters. Looking t the Merseyflight webcam right now, I can see a large digger which is obviously preparing the taxiway to the hangar. I can also see something the the right of the digger that I cannot quite make out. It has a sheen to it, and the only thing I can think of would be chain link fencing with the sun behind it - would that be correct? I presume that, when the construction starts on the junction between the parallel taxiway and the taxiway to the hangar, that part of the parallel taxiway may be closed for periods of time, leading to aircraft having to taxi along the runway. That could be interesting. Not wishing to be a speculation spoilsport but what is all the excitement about this hangar for. Everybody knows who it is for and what aircraft will use it. If the aircraft are used as they are supposed to be, frequently,then the hangar is going to spend it's time mostly empty. It isn't likely to bring much business to the airport unless it is offered to third party users for maintenance or suchlike. Just adding a different perspective to this subject.
|
|
|
Post by viscount on Aug 14, 2019 14:11:07 GMT 1
'Dalten1', it is hard visible evidence that someone is prepared to invest in structures within the Airport boundary, something lacking in recent years. True it will lead to little, if any, increase in business - it a is though a highly visible sign of progress and forward thinking - that is worth getting excited about.
|
|
|
Post by eye2eye5 on Aug 14, 2019 14:30:36 GMT 1
Agreed, Viscount. It's also regular income for the airport and should be looked at alongside the developments at XLR and Wynne which all help to compliment the regular passenger side. Nice to see your posts, Viscount.
|
|
|
Post by bulldog on Oct 8, 2019 12:01:54 GMT 1
Does anyone know why when cladding on new hangar appears complete it looks like the end facing the road is having large plywood sheets stuck all over it?
|
|
|
Post by davel on Oct 9, 2019 11:03:46 GMT 1
I think it's where the name of the owner will appear and it is covered up until the official opening.
|
|
|
Post by bulldog on Oct 9, 2019 11:21:15 GMT 1
I thought that but it is being very carefully cut to match the roofline, and appears to be being placed very carefully and precisely. It looks pretty permanent. Will stop and ask someone when I next go past.
|
|
|
Post by andyh on Oct 9, 2019 11:59:36 GMT 1
I thought that but it is being very carefully cut to match the roofline, and appears to be being placed very carefully and precisely. It looks pretty permanent. Will stop and ask someone when I next go past. A quick look suggests to me it is more of a stone / sandstone effect not plywood Scratch that. I got a better look this evening and it does indeed look plywood-like. I suspect though this is a base layer for a more standard aluminium sheet finish. And having checked the drawings submitted with the planning application (or application for lawful development) the final finish is a mixture of a dark grey composite panel system (for the upper parts of the structure) and 'precast brick finished panels in a glazed black finish' for the lower portion. So my earlier comment about the current material being a base layer seems reasonable...
|
|
|
Post by bulldog on Oct 11, 2019 10:47:03 GMT 1
Andy , your ideas make total sense now as the "plywood" sheeting is also being applied to the side
|
|
|
Post by ronturner on Oct 11, 2019 15:46:22 GMT 1
So. Gone are the days when you could just throw up an agricultural metal frame and clad it with corrugated sheets?
|
|
|
Post by optimum1878 on Oct 11, 2019 19:34:39 GMT 1
Top of the range then,lol
|
|
|
Post by Beemer on Oct 15, 2019 20:40:09 GMT 1
|
|