|
|
Post by LPL on Apr 20, 2012 22:32:35 GMT 1
Sorry the stats are a bit behind, been very busy trying (but failing so far) to find employment.
Just started to collect the data for January.
|
|
|
|
Post by LPL on Apr 26, 2012 18:41:27 GMT 1
Confirmed CAA scheduled flight stats for Liverpool in January 2012. Figures in brackets relate to same period last year.
Pax total:
294858 (2012)
312955 (2011)
-6% diff
Number of available seats by airline:
EZY 215856 (-11%)
FR 194670 (-2%)
KLM 11440 (-23%)
Wizz 11520 (-9%)
flyBE 14040 (-50%)
overall total 447526 (-13%)
Number of routes served:
49 (2012)
48 (2011)
+2% diff
Breakdown of number of routes served by airline:
EZY 25 (21)
FR 27 (27)
KLM 1 (1)
Wizz 3 (3)
flyBE 1 (2)
Eastern 0 (2)
Number of flights scheduled:
2824 (2012)
3374 (2011)
-18% diff
Average load factor for all flights:
69% (2012)
63% (2011)
6% diff
Average pax loading per flight:
106 (2012)
93(2011)
Note, for 2012 I have used flightstats.com to get the data for the number of departures/arrivals. The figures for 2011 was as per schedules in 09/27.
Now that I have a years worth of figures I can do some more with them, but the January 2011 figures are not as accurate as the January 2012 ones as I have taken them from timetables and dont know if those flights ended up being flown, whereas the January 2012 ones are as accurate as I can get as they are taken off Flightstats.
|
|
|
|
Post by LPL on Apr 27, 2012 17:47:39 GMT 1
This table shows the load factors in % order together with the average load per flight.
PALMA 94% 147
ALICANTE 88% 152
BARCELONA 84% 132
KATOWICE 84% 151
LANZAROTE 83% 153
MALAGA 81% 139
FUERTEVENTURA 80% 148
TENERIFE SOUTH 80% 151
GDANSK 79% 142
GENEVA 79% 123
PARIS CDG 79% 128
NICE 78% 122
WROCLAW 78% 148
BERLIN SXF 76% 118
BRATISLAVA 76% 144
MALTA 75% 116
SALZBURG 75% 117
FARO 74% 124
WARSAW 74% 132
GRENOBLE 70% 109
INNSBRUCK 69% 107
LAS PALMAS 69% 131
RIGA 69% 130
AMSTERDAM 68% 82
JERSEY 68% 106
KRAKOW 68% 118
MADRID 67% 109
TALLINN 67% 105
SZCZECIN 65% 123
KAUNAS 64% 120
LODZ 64% 120
POZNAN 64% 121
CARCASSONNE 63% 119
CORK 63% 119
LIMOGES 62% 117
ROME CIAMPINO 62% 117
BELFAST INT 61% 95
ISLE OF MAN 56% 54
STOCKHOLM SKAVSTA 55% 104
GIBRALTAR 54% 84
SHANNON 54% 103
OSLO RYGGE 52% 99
MILAN BERGAMO 51% 96
BRUSSELS 50% 78
DUBLIN 50% 95
KNOCK 50% 95
LONDONDERRY 49% 93
OSLO TORP 48% 91
LYON 44% 68
|
|
|
|
Post by LPL on Apr 28, 2012 0:18:35 GMT 1
Next table is the pax totals for January 2012 in % growth order: col1-route col2-January 2012 total col3-January 2011 total col4-% increase/decrease in growth col5-% increase/decrease in number of seats available
CARCASSONNE 3099 2176 42% 44%
GRENOBLE 870 643 35% -50%
MALTA 2329 1773 31% -4%
INNSBRUCK 1925 1513 27% 29%
POZNAN 3615 2882 25% 50%
LODZ 3371 2708 24% 40%
LONDONDERRY 7405 6048 22% 29%
BRATISLAVA 3756 3069 22% 44%
SHANNON 3087 2607 18% 15%
LAS PALMAS 2873 2443 18% 0%
KNOCK 5699 4866 17% -3%
JERSEY 4241 3641 16% 5%
ISLE OF MAN 12566 11043 14% 3%
WARSAW 3176 2860 11% 20%
OSLO RYGGE 1774 1603 11% 0%
STOCKHOLM SKAVSTA 2696 2471 9% 0%
SALZBURG 933 878 6% 0%
LIMOGES 3052 2932 4% 0%
KRAKOW 9933 9585 4% 17%
BELFAST INT 30721 30258 2% -7%
KAUNAS 3370 3381 -0% 40%
FUERTEVENTURA 5613 5769 -3% -5%
PARIS CDG 7411 7696 -4% -3%
GENEVA 18672 19659 -5% -13%
WROCLAW 3559 3769 -6% -20%
LANZAROTE 6131 6508 -6% -13%
AMSTERDAM 22110 23492 -6% -20%
TENERIFE SOUTH 3924 4170 -6% -7%
KATOWICE 2709 2884 -6% -18%
BERLIN SXF 7575 8710 -13% -29%
BARCELONA 10017 11622 -14% -34%
PALMA 3538 4266 -17% -45%
RIGA 3644 4397 -17% -7%
DUBLIN 21571 26454 -18% 7%
ALICANTE 12803 16958 -25% -32%
GDANSK 3116 4134 -25% -21%
FARO 5724 7705 -26% -31%
MALAGA 12474 16932 -26% -41%
MADRID 6122 8951 -32% -31%
OSLO TORP 3288 4812 -32% -22%
CORK 5235 7990 -34% -45%
MILAN BERGAMO 2498 3850 -35% 0%
LYON 821 1523 -46% -40%
total 279046 301631
New routes started in Jan 2012
BRUSSELS 3101
GIBRALTAR 2186
NICE 2934
ROME CIAMPINO 3036
SZCZECIN 2451
TALLINN 2104
total 15812
Discontinued routes in Jan 2012
ABERDEEN 725
BELFAST CITY 4506
BREMEN 2600
GERONA 2726
SOUTHAMPTON 767
total 11324
[/b][/pre] |
|
|
|
Post by LPL on Apr 28, 2012 0:51:20 GMT 1
This table shows the difference (% order) in the number of seats available in January 2012 against those for January 2011. col1-route col2-January 2012 total col3-January 2011 total col4-% increase/decrease in number of seats available
POZNAN 5670 3780 50%
BRATISLAVA 4914 3402 44%
CARCASSONNE 4914 3402 44%
KAUNAS 5292 3780 40%
LODZ 5292 3780 40%
LONDONDERRY 15120 11718 29%
INNSBRUCK 2808 2184 29%
WARSAW 4320 3600 20%
KRAKOW 14556 12468 17%
SHANNON 5670 4914 15%
DUBLIN 43092 40446 7%
JERSEY 6240 5928 5%
ISLE OF MAN 22464 21840 3%
LAS PALMAS 4158 4158 0%
LIMOGES 4914 4914 0%
MILAN BERGAMO 4914 4914 0%
OSLO RYGGE 3402 3402 0%
SALZBURG 1248 1248 0%
STOCKHOLM SKAVSTA 4914 4914 0%
PARIS CDG 9384 9672 -3%
KNOCK 11340 11718 -3%
MALTA 3120 3240 -4%
FUERTEVENTURA 7020 7362 -5%
RIGA 5292 5670 -7%
TENERIFE SOUTH 4914 5292 -7%
BELFAST INT 50544 54600 -7%
LANZAROTE 7380 8460 -13%
GENEVA 23760 27456 -13%
KATOWICE 3240 3960 -18%
WROCLAW 4536 5670 -20%
AMSTERDAM 32728 41088 -20%
GDANSK 3960 5040 -21%
OSLO TORP 6804 8694 -22%
BERLIN SXF 9984 14040 -29%
MADRID 9072 13104 -31%
FARO 7704 11202 -31%
ALICANTE 14598 21390 -32%
BARCELONA 11856 18096 -34%
LYON 1872 3120 -40%
MALAGA 15354 26070 -41%
CORK 8316 15120 -45%
PALMA 3744 6864 -45%
GRENOBLE 1248 2496 -50%
[/b][/pre] |
|
|
|
Post by LPL on Apr 28, 2012 0:53:04 GMT 1
This table is the combination of the last two above which hopefully shows which route performed better with an increase in seats filled as against the number of seats available: col1-route col2-January 2012 total col3-January 2011 total col4-% increase/decrease in growth col5-% increase/decrease in number of seats available col6-difference in col4 minus col5
GRENOBLE 870 643 35% -50% 85%
MALTA 2329 1773 31% -4% 35%
PALMA 3538 4266 -17% -45% 28%
BARCELONA 10017 11622 -14% -34% 21%
KNOCK 5699 4866 17% -3% 20%
LAS PALMAS 2873 2443 18% 0% 18%
BERLIN SXF 7575 8710 -13% -29% 16%
MALAGA 12474 16932 -26% -41% 15%
AMSTERDAM 22110 23492 -6% -20% 14%
WROCLAW 3559 3769 -6% -20% 14%
KATOWICE 2709 2884 -6% -18% 12%
JERSEY 4241 3641 16% 5% 11%
ISLE OF MAN 12566 11043 14% 3% 11%
OSLO RYGGE 1774 1603 11% 0% 11%
CORK 5235 7990 -34% -45% 11%
STOCKHOLM SKAVSTA 2696 2471 9% 0% 9%
BELFAST INT 30721 30258 2% -7% 9%
GENEVA 18672 19659 -5% -13% 8%
ALICANTE 12803 16958 -25% -32% 7%
LANZAROTE 6131 6508 -6% -13% 7%
SALZBURG 933 878 6% 0% 6%
FARO 5724 7705 -26% -31% 6%
LIMOGES 3052 2932 4% 0% 4%
SHANNON 3087 2607 18% 15% 3%
FUERTEVENTURA 5613 5769 -3% -5% 2%
TENERIFE SOUTH 3924 4170 -6% -7% 1%
PARIS CDG 7411 7696 -4% -3% -1%
MADRID 6122 8951 -32% -31% -1%
INNSBRUCK 1925 1513 27% 29% -1%
CARCASSONNE 3099 2176 42% 44% -2%
GDANSK 3116 4134 -25% -21% -3%
LYON 821 1523 -46% -40% -6%
LONDONDERRY 7405 6048 22% 29% -7%
WARSAW 3176 2860 11% 20% -9%
OSLO TORP 3288 4812 -32% -22% -10%
RIGA 3644 4397 -17% -7% -10%
KRAKOW 9933 9585 4% 17% -13%
LODZ 3371 2708 24% 40% -16%
BRATISLAVA 3756 3069 22% 44% -22%
POZNAN 3615 2882 25% 50% -25%
DUBLIN 21571 26454 -18% 7% -25%
MILAN BERGAMO 2498 3850 -35% 0% -35%
KAUNAS 3370 3381 -0% 40% -40%
[/b][/pre] |
|
|
|
Post by johnoakes on May 3, 2012 18:54:42 GMT 1
Just got back from a visit to a very wet and cold UK--will enjoy looking at the stats provided next week.A mixed bag at first sight.
Thanks again for the effort.
|
|
|
|
Post by LPL on May 4, 2012 0:15:10 GMT 1
Thanks for the comment, it helps to see that people take the time to read it.
I was beginning to think why take the time, trouble and effort to do the above.
|
|
|
|
Post by johnoakes on May 4, 2012 3:24:51 GMT 1
Don't despair they take a lot of reading and most of us just marvel at the results gf your efforts.Few of us are qualified to do no more than look.--sorry about the original typos--just soo tired after driving back from wet and miserable England-from 4° to 26° in 2 days. You should come down for a weekend special--€90 for a double weekend room B&B-- en suite with free collection and return to Geneva--cheap as chips and good for the morale. This offer only open to forum members and aircraft spotters LOL  |
|
|
|
Post by liverpoolman1 on May 4, 2012 8:01:46 GMT 1
Yes, LPL, we mere mortals stand in awe of your efforts. Each, I suppose, interpret them as they see fit. It would be interesting to be a fly on the wall and see what the airlines make of these, and many other, comparative figures; similarly the airport management team.
Congratulations once again.
|
|
|
|
Post by johnoakes on May 12, 2012 7:07:42 GMT 1
Having had time to have a better read it seems our position is on the slide a bit--6% drop overall is less good than of late.hope thsi is temporary and a result of route juggling not the beginning of a slow down or levelling out.
The offer to come down still stands esp. as employment is tough at the moment--treat yourself +1 to a bit of R&R -----30° today---nice just to sit in the garden,sip a glass and chill out.be tempted its easier to organise than you think.
|
|
|
|
Post by LPL on May 12, 2012 9:26:08 GMT 1
Having had time to have a better read it seems our position is on the slide a bit--6% drop overall is less good than of late.hope thsi is temporary and a result of route juggling not the beginning of a slow down or levelling out. The offer to come down still stands esp. as employment is tough at the moment--treat yourself +1 to a bit of R&R -----30° today---nice just to sit in the garden,sip a glass and chill out.be tempted its easier to organise than you think. Yes 6% down on pax but 10% down on available seats, which shows that if there are seats to be bought then LPL pax will use the flights. |
|
|
|
Post by johnoakes on May 13, 2012 6:40:09 GMT 1
Or does it show retrenching by the airlines as passengers per flight and thus yield rises?
These stats give lots of food for thought but overall give me little comfort.
I hope the annual passenger figures continue to climb because that appears to be our only lever in getting airlines interested.
ps free Wifi at the B&B. LOL
|
|
|
|
Post by LPL on May 16, 2012 12:53:20 GMT 1
This is the last of the series of tables, but if I have missed any out please ask. Table is in January 2012 load factor order listed by airline and route. col1 = route col2 = January 2012 load factor col3 = January 2011 load factor col4 = % diff between January 2011 and 2012 col5 = January 2012 pax load per flight col6 = January 2011 pax load per flight col7 = % diff between January 2011 and 2012
easyJet
PALMA 94% 62% 52% 147 97 52%
BARCELONA 84% 64% 32% 132 100 32%
PARIS CDG 79% 80% -1% 128 124 3%
GENEVA 79% 72% 10% 123 112 10%
NICE 78% 122
BERLIN SXF 76% 62% 22% 118 97 22%
SALZBURG 75% 70% 6% 117 110 6%
MALTA 75% 55% 36% 116 99 18%
GRENOBLE 70% 26%171% 109 40171%
INNSBRUCK 69% 69% -1% 107 108 -1%
JERSEY 68% 61% 11% 106 96 11%
MADRID 67% 68% -1% 109 107 3%
TALLINN 67% 105
BELFAST INT 61% 55% 10% 95 86 10%
GIBRALTAR 54% 84
BRUSSELS 50% 78
LYON 44% 49%-10% 68 76-10%
total 69% 62% 11% 109 98 11%
network 88% 87%
Ryanair
TENERIFE SOUTH 80% 79% 1% 151 149 1%
WROCLAW 78% 66% 18% 148 126 18%
BRATISLAVA 76% 90%-15% 144 171-15%
LAS PALMAS 69% 59% 18% 131 111 18%
RIGA 69% 78%-11% 130 147-11%
SZCZECIN 65% 123
POZNAN 64% 76%-16% 121 144-16%
LODZ 64% 72%-11% 120 135-11%
KAUNAS 64% 89%-29% 120 169-29%
CARCASSONNE 63% 64% -1% 119 121 -1%
CORK 63% 53% 19% 119 100 19%
LIMOGES 62% 60% 4% 117 113 4%
ROME CIAMPINO 62% 117
STOCKHOLM SKAVSTA 55% 50% 9% 104 95 9%
SHANNON 54% 53% 3% 103 100 3%
OSLO RYGGE 52% 47% 11% 99 89 11%
MILAN BERGAMO 51% 78%-35% 96 148-35%
KNOCK 50% 42% 21% 95 78 21%
DUBLIN 50% 65%-23% 95 124-23%
LONDONDERRY 49% 52% -5% 93 98 -5%
OSLO TORP 48% 55%-13% 91 105-13%
total 57% 62% -7% 108 117 -7%
network 71% 71%
Wizz
KATOWICE 84% 73% 15% 151 131 15%
GDANSK 79% 82% -4% 142 148 -4%
WARSAW 74% 79% -7% 132 143 -7%
total 78% 78% 0% 141 141 0%
Routes flown by more than one airline
ALICANTE 88% 79% 11% 152 137 11%
LANZAROTE 83% 77% 8% 153 141 8%
MALAGA 81% 65% 25% 139 110 26%
FUERTEVENTURA 80% 78% 2% 148 144 2%
FARO 74% 69% 8% 124 113 10%
KRAKOW 68% 77%-11% 118 130 -9%
AMSTERDAM 68% 57% 18% 82 66 23%
ISLE OF MAN 56% 51% 11% 54 47 15%
total 72% 65% 10% 99 89 10%
|
|
|
|
Post by ezylpl on May 16, 2012 17:27:08 GMT 1
This is good news - overall there has been an increase across LJLA's network, even with some of the routes we've lost the increased load factors will make up for a large amount of the passengers we've lost from the other routes.
|
|
