It will soon be sorted. but I am wondering if it could be something injested into the engine on climb out looking at the end result of the engine failure and its remains.
According to Aviation Safety Net the A380 has been involved in six incidents, three of them involving this kite (VH-OQA). Not the best of records to hold.
I will not put a U in Qantas I will not put a U in Qantas I will not put a U in Qantas I will not put a U in Qantas I will not put a U in Qantas I will not put a U in Qantas I will not put a U in Qantas I will not put a U in Qantas I will not put a U in Qantas I will not put a U in Qantas
Should it not be pronounced ...kantos...as there's no U?
I will not put a U in Qantas I will not put a U in Qantas I will not put a U in Qantas I will not put a U in Qantas I will not put a U in Qantas I will not put a U in Qantas I will not put a U in Qantas I will not put a U in Qantas I will not put a U in Qantas I will not put a U in Qantas
Should it not be pronounced ...kantos...as there's no U?
;D ;D
Nah it's Oz, mate - they pronounce things differently down there, I'm told!
You naughty boy. You're not alone I did a few years back and got the same reaction. Wait until you you get Hangar wrong - we'll expect a 100.
Now here's a coincidence, at least I hope it is. A Qantas 747 has had to land at the same airport almost 24 hours later with - you guessed it - an engine problem.