|
Post by ronturner on Dec 15, 2010 20:49:42 GMT 1
She tried it in the wrong country - Australia! A woman in the burqa was pulled over by the police because she was a "P" plate (provisional) driver and the plates weren't displayed correctly. He asked her for her license and asked her to remove her burqa so that he knew it was her license. She then accuses him of being racist and that the only reason he pulled her over was because she was wearing a burqa. She then tells him he will be sorry and that she would take him to court. Then she contacted the media and says that he was very racist and touched her burqa and she was intimidated by him. However luckily for the policeman the police car's video camera was operating and it was all caught on film. She has now been charged and supposedly is going to be jailed for 6 months and the judge said she was the racist one. Now her solicitor is saying it wasn't her who made the complaint but someone else in a burqa and they are now saying she shouldn't go to jail as she has 7 children. This video appears here: aca.ninemsn.com.au/Video.aspx?videoid=af53d2ac-f507-4e8d-983a-a5a259bbe6fc
|
|
|
Post by johnoakes on Dec 16, 2010 18:54:22 GMT 1
Not one bit surprised==sadly there will be loads of talk but no action. Thank God for the Frogs and the Swiss.
Some of us as you will no doubt recall have been speaking out at this process since the 1960s.
Have a good read of the koran sometime--its worse that Mein Kampf a plan for domination and conquest.
|
|
|
Post by Biggles on Dec 16, 2010 22:30:28 GMT 1
"For Evil to spread it takes no more than for sane people to do nothing." or similar..
The French and Swiss are prepared not to sit back and do nothing I totally support them in that effort. The UK is awash with left wing do gooders, environmental and green freindly fools, and a sucession of Ministers who can not see what is happening at the sharp end of civilisation because of their foolish decisions which are fast resulting in the UK vanishing into some sort of mass migration care home for anyone who wants to lie and cheat to sneak in and commit crime freeload and then claim asylum when challanged
It has been reported today in case it has not been seen, that cuts are to hit the Coast Guard Service, which will soon be reduced from 18 operating stations down to 8 and will only work during daylight hours ?? Two police officers have been seriously stabbed by a prisoner who was on release from prison but was wanted for not returning when he should have done so ? The crime the officers did was to check an out of date bus ticket and then realise who he was.
The country is going, sorry (no gone to rat sh..t) and Ministers are continuing to make it even worse day by day.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 16, 2010 22:42:44 GMT 1
Wouldn't it be great if the leaders of the worlds religions got together and picked out what they believed to be the most important parts of their own beliefs and put them forward to be included in just one world wide religion that we could all follow. Better still, could you 'IMAGINE' them taking a leaf out of John Lennon's book and scrapping the lot. After all religion is only a way of teaching the masses good from bad and providing the rules by which we interact with other members of our own societies.
Unfortunately, advances in technology have out grown secular religious beliefs. People's of the world have been educated to think for themselves and the rules that once governed our societies are no-longer made by religious leaders but by the very people who run the countries albeit guided by their religious upbringings.
Such a change would put an end to religious infighting and remove the religious tag from this sort of person, then we will all see them for what they really are.
|
|
|
Post by ronturner on Dec 17, 2010 7:30:12 GMT 1
Although not living in the UK any more, I was enraged last night, to see on BBC news, an Asylum seeker from Iraq who killed a 12 year old girl has been allowed to stay in UK. Apparently, not only was he here illegally but was already banned from driving. This means he must have been through the courts at some stage and was not deported then. This little girl and her family have paid, and will pay for ever, a high price for this man's freedom and the criminal irresponsibility of those who did not deport the offender in the first place. It was claimed that Iraq is not a safe place for the man to return to. I ask, if that is the case, why have British and US troops left there. What an insult to those soldiers who served there and some died, to suggest that what they did there counts for nothing. (By the way..thank you Mr Blair and Mr Bush for the lies you told in stoking up this fire in the first place.)
I am not totally against immigration. I am an immigrant myself; in France, but I am incensed at the unfairness of how plain ordinary innocent people are treated and what is happening to our way of life by deliberate uncontrolled immigration, an elitist judicial system that seems to be weighted in favour of changing our society for ever and a general lack of willingness to tackle a problem that will leave our children and grandchildren in fear of their lives.
|
|
|
Post by johnoakes on Dec 17, 2010 9:27:53 GMT 1
A true tale and a set of figues--figures first--if you add together all the spellings of the first name mohammed(muhammed etc) it has become the most common boys name this year in Britain---its all over---these votes will all be sought by the politicians and concessions given to gain this--thanks to proxy votes the gangmasters can offer masses of votes en bloc in return for favours( of course this isn't happening already--even though there have been prosecutions for this kind of vote rigging--and its ALL parties not just labour.)-I have observed children going into polling booths to "help " illiterate mum to vote--it also ensures she votes as she has been told--so much for a free and secret ballot.
What is the difference between an immigraNT AND A COLONIST--AN IMMIGRANT ARRIVES AND ADOPTS THE MORES OF HIS ADOPTED COUNTRY--A COLONIST ARRIVES WITH THE AIM OF MAKING THE HOST NATION LIKE HIS OWN.
The 3rd world is violently anti colonialist .very interestingly they have no demand for their colonists to be returned to their homeland as our were made to(those that weren't murdered that is.)
When working in Bradford with a moslem majority it was demanded that a room be put aside for prayer during the day--the concession was to be expensive but was going ahead. I expressed support for this as I would love somewhere to have a quiet read of my Bible during the day--on hearing of this the idea was rapidly dropped--after all Bible reading would cause pollution in a room reserved for koranic mind washing--nice to win one however small.
|
|
|
Post by Biggles on Dec 17, 2010 21:27:30 GMT 1
Ron regarding your comments concerning the young girl killed by the Iraqi asylum seeker. Just to add my thoughts on this as the PM and also Jack Straw have come out fighting on the subject today and are disgisted he has been allowed to remain in the UK with his wife (English) and his kids. The court decided he could not be deported as it would infringe his human rights by sending him back to a country which may torture him ? Now I want to know the validity of this, this youth was awaiting deportation as a failed asylum seeker, when he discovered he was being deported he found and married an English girl and had a child, thus enabling him to use this marriage as a reason why he could no longer be deported ? I was under the impression when anyone who undertook a legal marriage had to make a legal declaration that there was NO lawful impediment or reason why they could not take the proposed spouse as a wife or husband ? I would have thought therefore that if the marriage was undertaken soley to skirt round applied deportation regulations and that the marriage would prevent a lawful order for deportation being carried out, THAT MAKES TtHIS MARRIAGE ILLEGAL ? and if so he can be deported under the original order. Or is that too simple ? If right it puts a lot of people in jepordy of a similar ruling. In conclusion this youth was already disqualified at the time of the death when he left her under the wheels of his car as she was dying, he has since been arrested another two or three times for a similar offence of driving whilst banned.
|
|
|
Post by ronturner on Dec 18, 2010 9:20:15 GMT 1
Biggles, Thanks for your information. I am thoroughly disgusted with the whole business. I am not a racist. I have black and coloured people in my family. I am not a fascist, but I am coming round to the idea that some of the BNP's ideas are worth thinking about. They seem to be the only party concerned with LAW and ORDER and preservation of our society, and the immediate withdrawal of our troops from Afghanistan. Everybody else gives lip service. It is any wonder that in France, the right wing party of Le Penn has such a stronghold in the South of France. (In case you did not know Marseilles is now regarded as being part of North Africa rather than France.) Finally, can I assume that this horrible individual who has repeated offences since the ones under discussion is still free to raom the streets and mow people down?
|
|
|
Post by Biggles on Dec 18, 2010 22:08:40 GMT 1
He certainly is sadly. As I said, I want to discover if the marriage IS LEGAL, if not the answer is simple, or should be.
|
|